Breaking the Cycle of Impunity: Holding Rwanda Accountable for Atrocities in North Kivu

Ethnic Manipulation and Massacres: The True Cost of Rwanda’s Proxy War in North Kivu

In the heart of Africa, a humanitarian crisis is unfolding, albeit one that has hitherto received scant attention from the international community. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a nation endowed with abundant natural resources and a rich tapestry of cultural diversity, finds itself once again under siege. This time, the aggressor is not only internal conflict but an external force masked behind the guise of rebellion: Rwanda, operating through the M23/AFC terrorist organisation. The people of North Kivu, comprising the Nande, Hutu, Hunde, Nyanga, Tembo, Kumu, Tutsi, Bakano, Bokobo, Bakusu, Baliri, Bambuti, and other ethnic groups, have united in their opposition to this aggression. Their demands encompass not only the desire for survival but also the pursuit of justice, peace, and the safeguarding of their homeland.

The gravity of the situation is paramount. For many years, the eastern provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have been plagued by violence, displacement, and exploitation. A salient feature of the present crisis is the flagrant disregard for both sovereignty and human dignity. Accusations have been made against Rwandan genocidal criminals and their M23 criminal proxies of perpetrating atrocities including massacres of civilian populations, systematic rape, and the deliberate destruction of infrastructure such as water and electricity supplies in Goma. These actions are not merely acts of war; they are calculated strategies aimed at the destabilisation of the region and the plunder of the DRC’s vast mineral wealth.

The issue at hand is of significant concern, as it underscores a pervasive global failure to safeguard vulnerable populations from the predatory actions of state actors. This failure challenges the fundamental principles of international law, which demand respect for territorial integrity and the protection of civilians.Furthermore, it exposes the complicity of silence—how influential nations and institutions such as the United States, the European Union, and the African Union have disregarded Rwanda’s transgressions, thereby emboldening further aggression.

For the ethnic communities of North Kivu, this struggle is deeply personal, representing a rich tapestry of cultures that have coexisted for generations, despite historical tensions.Their unity in opposition to Rwandan interference is a testament to their shared commitment to peace and harmony. As Ezéchiel Sebuliri, the national president of the Hutu community, eloquently articulated, “We acknowledge the challenges within our nation, yet it falls beyond the purview of foreign entities to intervene on behalf of a community that has not solicited such support.”This sentiment resonates with the collective voice of millions across the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), underscoring the imperative for solutions to emerge from within, rather than being imposed by external actors with vested agendas.The gravity of the situation cannot be overstated.

The repercussions of Rwanda’s actions extend far beyond the borders of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and if left unchecked, this aggression risks setting a dangerous precedent for other resource-rich regions in Africa and around the world. Furthermore, it threatens to deepen divisions within the DRC itself, undermining efforts towards national cohesion and stability.

This article seeks to shed light on the plight of the North Kivu Intercommunity and their courageous stand against Rwandan aggression. Through an exploration of the key players, the atrocities committed, and the systemic failures that have allowed this crisis to persist, the aim is to galvanise action from the international community and human rights organisations.The people of North Kivu are calling for solidarity—not charity—but a recognition of their humanity and a commitment to uphold the principles of justice and sovereignty. The question remains as to whether the global community will heed this call.

The Ethnic Tapestry of Walikale: Unity Amidst Diversity

The Walikale territory, situated within the lush highlands of North Kivu, serves as a microcosm of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s extraordinary cultural diversity. This region is home to over a dozen distinct ethnic groups, including the Nande, Hutu, Hunde, Nyanga, Tembo, Kumu, Tutsi, Bakano, Bokobo, Bakusu, Baliri, and Bambuti. The Walikale territory thus exemplifies the intricate mosaic of identities that define the DRC. The communities in question are distinguished by a shared history, languages, and traditions, despite the challenges posed by political instability and external threats. The resilience and harmony demonstrated by these communities is remarkable, and it is evident that they have a long-standing ability to coexist. However, the recent resurgence of violence, instigated by Rwandan aggression through the M23/AFC Terrorist outfit, has tested this unity, compelling these groups to confront existential threats while reaffirming their collective resolve to preserve their shared homeland.

Historical Context: Coexistence and Challenges

The ethnic groups of Walikale have historically coexisted in relative peace, navigating differences through dialogue and mutual respect. The Nande, one of the largest communities in the region, are renowned for their entrepreneurial spirit and agricultural expertise. The Hutu and Tutsi, whose presence in the area predates colonial boundaries, have deep-rooted ties to the land and maintain strong cultural traditions. The Hunde, indigenous to the region, are celebrated for their environmental stewardship and their role as custodians of local knowledge.Smaller groups like the Bakano, Bokobo, and Bakusu contribute to the region’s cultural richness through their unique customs and artisanal skills, and even the Bambuti, often marginalised due to their hunter-gatherer lifestyle, play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and preserving ancestral wisdom.

Despite the occasional emergence of tensions, particularly during periods of political upheaval or competition over resources, these communities have traditionally utilised an internal dispute resolution system. Elders and traditional leaders have acted as mediators, ensuring that conflicts are addressed without resorting to violence.This system of governance, rooted in communal values, has fostered a sense of belonging and interdependence among the diverse groups of Walikale.

The Impact of M23/AFC Terrorists and Rwandan Aggression

The emergence of the M23/AFC terrorist outfit, which is supported by Rwanda, has caused a significant disruption to the fragile equilibrium that had been in place. Since its resurgence in late 2021, the M23 terrorists have been responsible for a series of attacks on civilian populations across North Kivu, with a view to creating a climate of fear and destabilising the region. In Walikale, villages have been destroyed, families displaced and livelihoods destroyed. The terrorists’ attacks are not random; they are part of a broader strategy to weaken local resistance and pave the way for Rwandan control over strategic areas rich in minerals such as coltan, gold, and cobalt.The impact on the ethnic groups of Walikale has been devastating, with entire communities being forced to flee their ancestral lands, leaving behind homes, farms, and sacred sites. The Nande, who predominate in trade and agriculture in the region, have suffered a significant deterioration in their economic situation. The Hutu and Tutsi, already confronted with intricate dynamics stemming from regional politics, are now confronted with intensified stigmatisation and suspicion.The Hunde, intimately intertwined with their environment, have observed the devastation of forests and wildlife habitats, a development that poses a threat to their way of life. The Bambuti, who depend on the forest for sustenance, have also been adversely affected, losing access to vital resources.

Resilience and Resistance: Standing Together Against Aggression

Despite the challenges faced, the people of Walikale have exhibited remarkable resilience. Rather than succumbing to division, they have united under the banner of the North Kivu Intercommunity, a coalition representing all ethnic groups in the region. This alliance underscores a shared understanding that the threat posed by Rwanda and the M23 terrorist outfit transcends individual identities—it is a threat to the very fabric of their society. Leaders from each community, including Ezéchiel Sebuliri of the Hutu and Pacifique Misingi of the Walikale communities, have issued powerful statements condemning the aggression and calling for solidarity.

Their message is unequivocal: no foreign power has the right to interfere in Congolese affairs under the pretext of protecting any community.As Sebuliri emphasised, “There are problems and there will always be, but they will only be resolved internally.” This sentiment resonates profoundly across Walikale, where the emphasis remains on resolving issues through dialogue and cooperation rather than external intervention.By standing together, these communities are not only resisting aggression but also reaffirming their commitment to peaceful coexistence.

Cultural Contributions and Shared Heritage

Beyond their resilience in the face of adversity, the ethnic groups of Walikale continue to enrich the region’s cultural landscape.From the vibrant music and dance traditions of the Bakano to the intricate woodcarvings of the Bokobo, each group contributes uniquely to the cultural tapestry of the territory .Traditional ceremonies, festivals, and rituals serve as reminders of their shared heritage and interconnectedness . Notably, these cultural expressions persist despite the ongoing conflict, providing a source of hope and inspiration for future generations.

The ethnic groups of Walikale serve as a testament to the strength and diversity of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).Their response to the Rwandan-backed M23 aggression underscores not only their vulnerability but also their determination to protect their homeland.By uniting against external threats and reaffirming their commitment to peace, they present a compelling example of how diversity can be a source of strength rather than division. The narrative of Walikale serves as a poignant call to action, underscoring the imperative for the preservation of cultural identity and the pursuit of justice.

The Anatomy of Aggression: Unpacking Rwanda’s Role in North Kivu’s Crisis

At the core of the escalating crisis in North Kivu lies a sinister reality: the Rwandan government’s covert involvement in fuelling the M23/AFC terrorist outfit. While Rwanda publicly denies direct involvement, mounting evidence points to its strategic orchestration of this proxy conflict, driven by a dual agenda of territorial expansion and resource extraction. This section will delve into the motivations behind Rwanda’s aggression, the modus operandi of the M23/AFC terrorists, and the catastrophic consequences of their actions on the civilian population of North Kivu. By examining specific incidents, testimonies, and patterns of behaviour, we will uncover the true nature of this assault on Congolese sovereignty and humanity.

Rwanda’s Strategic Motives: A Calculated Agenda

Rwanda’s intervention in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is not merely spontaneous or altruistic in nature; rather, it is a meticulously calculated strategy rooted in both geopolitical ambition and economic greed. Since the 1994 genocide, Rwanda has repeatedly invaded Congolese territory, ostensibly to neutralise security threats posed by remnants of Hutu extremist groups, such as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). However, this narrative is increasingly questionable when viewed in the context of the scale and scope of Rwanda’s operations in North Kivu. A close examination reveals a more sinister undercurrent, one that is driven by a dual agenda: the systematic exploitation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s mineral wealth and the pursuit of territorial expansion to consolidate regional dominance.

The Lure of Mineral Wealth: Fueling Economic Ambition

The primary motivation behind Rwanda’s military intervention in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is the country’s abundant mineral wealth, particularly in North Kivu province, which is a significant source of critical minerals such as coltan, gold, tin, tungsten, and cobalt. These minerals are essential for the production of modern technology, including smartphones, laptops, electric vehicles, and renewable energy systems. The control over these resources not only leads to substantial economic gains but also provides a strategic advantage in the global marketplace.

By providing support to the M23/AFC terrorists, Rwanda effectively secures control over these lucrative mining zones, enabling illicit trade networks that funnel billions of dollars’ worth of ‘blood minerals’ into its economy. Rwandan military high ranking thugs have been directly implicated in coordinating M23 operations, providing weapons, training, and logistical support. This collaboration serves to obscure the distinction between state-sponsored aggression and militia terrorism, enabling Rwanda to project power while maintaining plausible deniability.

The exploitation inherent in this plunder is characterised through coercion and violence to control key mining sites by terrorist groups such as the M23/AFC. Miners, many of whom are impoverished locals seeking income, are compelled to work under hazardous conditions with minimal compensation. The minerals extracted are then trafficked across porous borders into Rwanda, where they are subsequently laundered and sold as “Rwandan” exports. This process involves a network of intermediaries, including corrupt officials, traders, and multinational corporations eager to secure inexpensive raw materials regardless of their origins.

It is evident that Rwanda has experienced significant economic benefits as a result of its engagement in the mineral trade. Despite its limited domestic mineral reserves, the country has emerged as a major exporter of coltan and other critical minerals. This substantial revenue has had a substantial impact on Kigali’s economy, providing substantial funds for terrorism campaigns and enhancing its geopolitical influence. For criminal Paul Kagame, whose autocracy is characterised by authoritarian control and militarised diplomacy, the DRC represents a multifaceted challenge and opportunity. The DRC’s vast mineral wealth and internal instability can be exploited to enhance Rwanda’s geopolitical influence.

Territorial Expansion: Creating a Buffer Zone

Territorial expansion is another critical dimension of Rwanda’s agenda. The destabilisation of North Kivu and the fostering of divisions among ethnic groups is a strategy employed by Kigali in order to create a buffer zone along its western border. This strategy enhances Rwanda’s security and positions it as a dominant regional player capable of influencing the political and economic dynamics of the Great Lakes region.

The buffer zone is a multifaceted entity, serving several purposes. Primarily, it functions as a bulwark against perceived threats, most notably the remnants of Hutu extremist groups such as the FDLR. While Rwanda asserts that its interventions are intended to neutralize these groups, evidence suggests that its operations extend beyond this objective. Secondly, the buffer zone enables Rwanda to exercise control over resource-rich territories, ensuring a consistent influx of illicit profits. Thirdly, it serves to reinforce Rwanda’s narrative of being a stabilising force in the region, despite the fact that its actions are actually causing destabilisation in neighbouring states.

For criminal Paul Kagame, the Rwandan autocratic leader who has consolidated his regime through a combination of militarism and authoritarianism, territorial expansion is not merely a defensive measure but a means of projecting power. By establishing spheres of influence in eastern DRC, Rwanda positions itself as a hegemony in the Great Lakes region, capable of shaping outcomes to its advantage. This ambition is part of a broader vision on Kagame’s part to transform Rwanda into a regional powerhouse, leveraging its strategic location and economic growth to dominate neighbouring countries.

Ethnic Manipulation: Dividing to Conquer

A fundamental element of Rwanda’s strategy pertains to the exploitation of ethnic divisions within North Kivu, where the government has been accused of fostering mistrust and animosity among communities, thereby creating a justification for its ongoing presence in the region. The rhetoric employed by the M23/AFC terrorist outfit, which purports to safeguard Tutsi interests, is particularly insidious in nature, as it seeks to exploit the lingering tensions that have arisen from regional conflicts. However, leaders such as Farry Gitori, representative of the Tutsi community, have unequivocally rejected this narrative, stating: “We do not need Rwanda to speak on our behalf. Our destiny lies in our hands, and we will determine it together with our fellow Congolese.”

This rejection underscores the resilience of North Kivu’s communities, who refuse to be pawns in a geopolitical game orchestrated by Kigali. Nevertheless, Rwanda’s efforts to stoke ethnic divisions have had devastating consequences, as evidenced by massacres, sexual violence, and forced displacement, which have deepened mistrust among communities, making reconciliation more difficult. By fragmenting Congolese society along ethnic lines, Rwanda ensures that local resistance remains fragmented and ineffective.

A Calculated Agenda: Power, Profit, and Plausible Deniability

Rwanda’s intervention in North Kivu is indicative of a calculated agenda driven by power, profit, ethnic cleansing and plausible deniability. By framing its actions as a humanitarian mission, Kigali obscures its predatory and genocidal intentions, attempting to legitimize theft and mass murder under the guise of benevolence. The North Kivu Intercommunity has exposed this fallacy, emphasizing that the war waged by Rwanda has no moral or legal basis. As Ezéchiel Sebuliri, the national president of the Hutu community, has admonished, “I convey a resounding message to the sons of the nation who align with Rwanda and the M23: refrain from any association with the adversary to Balkanize or seek to divide our nation.”

The consequences of Rwanda’s aggression are far-reaching, extending well beyond the province of North Kivu. The systematic exploitation of natural resources has led to significant impoverishment of the local population, exacerbating environmental degradation and perpetuating cycles of violence and instability. This has resulted in the displacement of entire communities, upending their lives and disrupting their way of life, while the unregulated mining industry has had a devastating impact on ecosystems. For the people of North Kivu, the human cost of Rwanda’s ambitions is immeasurable.

A Call for Accountability

Rwanda’s strategic motives reveal a disturbing disregard for human life and international law. Its actions in North Kivu are not about protecting vulnerable populations or promoting stability; they are about consolidating power, exploiting resources, and asserting dominance. This agenda comes at a significant cost: the devastation of Congolese communities, the erosion of regional stability, and the undermining of global norms around sovereignty and accountability.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into the concrete measures that the international community is obliged to undertake in order to address the crisis at hand. These measures encompass the imposition of sanctions on Rwandan leaders and the provision of support for transitional justice mechanisms for victims. The era of inaction has come to an end; the time for meaningful intervention is now. The question that we must pose is whether the world will rise to the occasion, or whether it will continue to prioritise profit over principle. The answer to this question is predicated on our collective resolve to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity.

The Modus Operandi of the M23/AFC Terrorists

The M23/AFC terrorists, serving as Rwanda’s primary instrument in executing this proxy war, have adopted a brutal and methodical approach to warfare. Comprised predominantly of Rwandese criminals and led by Rwanda Tutsi deserters of the Congolese army, the outfit re-emerged in late 2021 after years of dormancy—a resurgence that coincided with heightened tensions between Kinshasa and Kigali. This timing is indicative of Rwanda’s intent to reassert dominance in North Kivu, leveraging the M23/AFC as a tool to destabilise the region, exploit its resources, and weaken local resistance. The terrorists’ tactics are not random acts of violence but calculated strategies designed to instil fear, displace populations, and erode social cohesion.

Targeting Civilian Infrastructure: A Strategy of Chaos

A distinctive feature of the M23/AFC’s modus operandi is the deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure. In November 2022, during their occupation of Goma, the rebels systematically cut off water and electricity supplies to the city, causing widespread disruption to the lives of hundreds of thousands of residents. Hospitals were forced to operate without power, endangering patients’ lives, while families struggled to access clean water, leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases such as cholera and dysentery.

The deliberate looting and repurposing of schools and residential homes as military bases has had severe consequences for children, who have been deprived of access to education, and for families, who have been left homeless. These actions are not merely collateral damage; they are deliberate strategies aimed at eroding social cohesion and creating dependency. By dismantling the very foundations of community life – access to healthcare, education, and basic utilities – the M23/AFC terrorists ensures that even if they retreat, the scars they leave behind will persist for generations. As Beatrice, a nurse from Goma, eloquently observed, “We encountered patients succumbing due to the inability to operate machinery or refrigerate medications. It felt as though we were engaged in dual confrontations – one against the spectre of illness itself, and another against those who sought our downfall.”

The deliberate destruction of infrastructure is a deliberate tactic that serves a dual purpose: it weakens local governance and exacerbates civilian suffering, creating an environment where survival becomes nearly impossible without external assistance. The psychological impact of such tactics cannot be overstated, as communities are left feeling abandoned, vulnerable, and stripped of agency.

Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War: Humiliation and Division

The use of sexual violence as a weapon of war has been documented on a widespread scale, with a significant proportion of cases involving female victims, including children. Survivors have reported incidents of gang rape, mutilation, and abduction. One case that has been documented involved a young girl named Marie (name changed for privacy), who was abducted from her village near Rutshuru and held captive for several weeks. She endured repeated assaults before managing to escape. This case exemplifies a pervasive pattern of sexual violence, serving as a means of inflicting humiliation, trauma, and displacement upon entire communities.

These acts can be considered not merely crimes of opportunity, but rather part of a systematic campaign to deepen divisions among ethnic groups and undermine trust within communities. By targeting women, who often serve as pillars of familial and communal stability, the M23/AFC seeks to destabilise entire societies. Survivors face not only profound physical and psychological harm, but also societal stigma, which further isolates them and hinders efforts towards reconciliation.

As emphasised by Farry Gitori, representative of the Tutsi community, “It is imperative to acknowledge the autonomy and self-determination of our communities, and to recognise that our destiny is not predetermined by external forces. Our future is to be shaped collectively, in unison with our fellow Congolese.” These assertions underscore the profound resilience exhibited by North Kivu’s communities, who are steadfast in their refusal to allow external actors to capitalise on their differences for personal gain. However, the extensive utilisation of sexual violence as a weapon of war underscores the extent to which the M23/AFC — and by extension, Rwanda criminals— will go to achieve their objectives.

Massacres of Civilian Populations: Systematic Terror

The terrorists’ brutality is further highlighted by massacres of civilian populations. In January 2023, for instance, the village of Kibumba was attacked, resulting in the deaths of at least 50 unarmed villagers. Eyewitnesses reported that the attackers deliberately targeted women, children, and the elderly, sparing no one. Survivors have described scenes of unspeakable horror, including homes set alight, bodies strewn across fields, and survivors fleeing into the bush with nothing but the clothes on their backs.

These incidents are not isolated; they form part of a systematic effort to destabilise the region and erode trust among ethnic groups. By committing atrocities against civilians, the M23/AFC aims to instill fear, force displacement, and weaken local resistance. Such tactics create a climate of terror that makes it nearly impossible for communities to organise or resist. For survivors such as Jean-Pierre, a farmer from Walikale whose village was razed, the trauma extends far beyond material loss. Recalling the events, he stated, “They came at night, shooting everywhere. We ran into the forest with nothing. When we returned days later, everything was gone — our crops, our animals, even our tools. Now we have nothing.”

The deliberate targeting of civilians is indicative of a blatant disregard for human life and a flagrant disregard for established international law. These massacres must be regarded as more than mere acts of violence; they are to be considered as part of a broader strategy to fragment communities, sow division, and assert control over resource-rich territories.

Environmental Devastation: Exploiting Resources at Any Cost

In addition to targeting human populations, the M23/AFC has had a devastating impact on the environment of North Kivu. Forests have been cleared to make way for mining operations, rivers have been polluted with toxic run-off, and wildlife habitats have been destroyed. Artisanal miners, lacking proper equipment and safety measures, face daily risks of injury or death. Even the Bambuti, an indigenous hunter-gatherer community that relies on forest ecosystems for sustenance, have been compelled to endure precarious conditions due to the loss of access to vital resources.

The environmental degradation that has occurred is not an accident; it is a direct consequence of the terrorists’ focus on resource extraction. Mineral wealth in the form of coltan, gold, tin, tungsten, and cobalt is abundant in North Kivu and is smuggled across porous borders into Rwanda, where it is laundered and sold as “Rwandan” exports. The ecological impact of this plunder is likely to engender long-term consequences for the biodiversity and climate resilience of the region, further exacerbating the hardships experienced by already marginalised communities.

A Calculated Campaign of Destruction

The modus operandi of the M23/AFC terrorists has been revealed to be a calculated campaign of destruction aimed at the destabilisation of North Kivu and the exploitation of its resources. By targeting civilian infrastructure, perpetrating sexual violence, massacring unarmed villagers, and destroying ecosystems, the terrorists ensure that even after they retreat, the scars they leave behind will persist for generations. Entire communities have been pushed to the brink of survival, their lives upended by violence, displacement, and environmental degradation.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into the concrete measures that the international community is obliged to undertake to address the crisis at hand. These measures encompass the imposition of sanctions on Rwandan leaders and the provision of support for transitional justice mechanisms for victims. The era of inaction has come to an end; the time for meaningful intervention is now. The question that we must pose is whether the world will rise to the occasion, or whether it will continue to prioritise profit over principle. The answer to this question is predicated on our collective resolve to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity.

Patterns of Destruction: Infrastructure, Livelihoods, and Displacement

Beyond the immediate loss of life, the M23/AFC’s criminality has had a profound impact on North Kivu’s infrastructure, economy, and environment. The deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure, coupled with the systematic destruction of livelihoods, has resulted in a humanitarian crisis that extends far beyond the immediate battlefield. Entire communities have been pushed to the brink of survival, their lives upended by violence, displacement, and environmental degradation. This section examines the cascading effects of the conflict, highlighting how the destruction of essential services, agricultural systems, and ecosystems perpetuates cycles of suffering and instability.

Key Facilities in Ruins: Undermining Security and Stability

A distinctive feature of the M23/AFC’s modus operandi is its deliberate targeting of critical infrastructure. During clashes, facilities such as Munzenze Prison, which housed hundreds of inmates, were bombed, leading to escapes and further insecurity. The prison break resulted in the release of dangerous criminals back into society and created an atmosphere of fear and lawlessness, thereby undermining efforts to maintain order in already fragile areas.

Moreover, hospitals, schools, and water treatment facilities have been subject to deliberate targeting or repurposing as military bases. In Goma, for instance, the terrorists’ occupation resulted in the disruption of essential services, leading to a state of disorder among the local population. Hospitals faced challenges in maintaining operational capacity due to the absence of electricity, which jeopardised patients’ well-being. Concurrently, communities experienced outbreaks of preventable diseases due to the unavailability of clean water. Furthermore, educational institutions, which should provide a secure environment for learning, have been left in a state of abandonment or looting, resulting in the denial of education to children and the obstruction of future prospects for generations to come.

The deliberate destruction of infrastructure is a deliberate strategy that serves a dual purpose: it weakens local governance and exacerbates civilian suffering, creating dependency and despair. By targeting the very foundations of community life, the M23/AFC ensures that even if they retreat, the scars they leave behind will persist for years to come.

Agricultural Devastation: Destroying the Backbone of Rural Livelihoods

Agriculture, the primary means of subsistence for the rural population of North Kivu, has been particularly impacted by the ongoing terrorism. Once fertile fields have been set alight, livestock has been slaughtered and tools have been confiscated or destroyed. For farmers such as Jean-Pierre, whose case study was previously examined, this devastation represents more than just a material loss; it signifies the severing of their connection to the land, which serves as a source of identity, sustenance, and pride.

The deliberate targeting of agriculture is not random; it is a strategic tactic aimed at eroding resilience and forcing populations into dependency. Without access to seeds, tools, or fertile land, farmers are left destitute, relying on humanitarian aid to survive. According to reports from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), over 70% of households in conflict-affected areas face severe food insecurity, with malnutrition rates soaring among children and vulnerable groups.

Markets, once vibrant economic hubs, have now become desolate, their stalls reduced to embers. The dissolution of trade networks has had far-reaching consequences for the region, engendering a decline in local economies and exacerbating poverty. Individuals engaged in artisanal trades and small business ventures, who were reliant on these markets for their livelihoods, are now confronted with the prospect of unemployment, thereby intensifying the economic repercussions of the terrorism.

Cascading Effects: Essential Services and Daily Survival

The interruption to essential services has had a profound impact on daily life, with communities facing severe challenges in accessing basic amenities such as clean water, healthcare, and electricity. This has led to a situation where families are compelled to seek refuge in other areas, resulting in an increase in the number of internally displaced people (IDPs). According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) currently hosts over 6 million IDPs, with North Kivu bearing the brunt of this displacement.

It is evident that IDP camps, frequently characterised by overcrowding and inadequate provision of essential services, act as conducive environments for the propagation of diseases and the exploitation of individuals. The dissemination of diseases such as cholera, malaria, and respiratory infections is expedited under unsanitary conditions, resulting in the rapid overburdening of already-constrained health facilities. Women and children, who experience heightened vulnerability due to displacement, confront elevated risks of sexual violence, trafficking, and exploitation. Individuals who manage to evade the immediate perils of war encounter impediments in their attempts to reconstruct their lives, finding themselves ensnared in a web of dependency with minimal prospects of escape.

Environmental Degradation: A Threat to Biodiversity and Climate Resilience

The environmental consequences of the conflict are equally devastating. Forests have been cleared to make way for mining operations, rivers have been polluted with toxic run-off, and wildlife habitats have been destroyed. The extraction of coltan, gold, and other minerals – often carried out through unregulated artisanal mining – has left landscapes scarred and ecosystems irreparably damaged.

Artisanal miners are exposed to considerable risks due to their lack of access to proper equipment and safety measures. These risks are further compounded by the nature of their work, which often exposes them to hazardous conditions, including exposure to mercury, cyanide, and other chemicals utilised in the processing of ores. The aforementioned practices pose a dual threat, endangering not only human health but also contaminating soil and water sources, thereby jeopardising biodiversity and public health.

The Bambuti, an indigenous hunter-gatherer community that relies on forest ecosystems for sustenance, have been compelled to endure precarious circumstances. Their displacement from ancestral lands has resulted in the loss of access to vital resources, including medicinal plants, game, and freshwater. This predicament highlights the broader repercussions of environmental degradation on marginalized communities, whose traditional ways of life are progressively endangered.

The ecological damage caused by the terrorism has the potential to engender long-term consequences for the region’s biodiversity and climate resilience. Deforestation has been demonstrated to contribute to soil erosion, reduce carbon sequestration, and exacerbate the impacts of climate change. As global temperatures rise, the degraded environment becomes less capable of supporting the needs of both humans and wildlife, creating a vicious cycle of resource scarcity and conflict.

A Crisis That Demands Immediate Action

The patterns of destruction wrought by the M23/AFC reveal a calculated strategy aimed at the destabilisation of North Kivu and the exploitation of its resources. By targeting infrastructure, livelihoods and ecosystems, the terrorists ensure that even after their retreat, the scars they leave behind will persist for generations. Entire communities have been pushed to the brink of survival, their lives upended by massacres, displacement and environmental degradation.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into the concrete measures that the international community is obliged to undertake to address the crisis at hand. These measures encompass the imposition of sanctions on Rwandan leaders and the provision of support for sustainable development initiatives that are designed to empower local communities. The era of inaction has come to an end; the time for meaningful intervention is now. The question that we must pose is whether the world will rise to the occasion, or whether it will continue to prioritise profit over principle. The answer to this question is predicated on our collective resolve to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity.

Testimonies of Survival: Voices from the Ground

In order to comprehend the full extent of the human cost of this crisis, it is essential to heed the voices of those who have endured it. These narratives, characterised by their authenticity, unadulterated nature and personal intimacy, unveil the profound ruptures engendered by the terrorism in North Kivu. They not only illuminate the immediate devastation wrought by violence, but also the enduring scars that persist well after the cessation of hostilities. Through these narratives, it is possible to gain a more profound understanding of the ways in which war disrupts lives, dismantles communities, and erodes hope.

Jean-Pierre: A Farmer’s Despair

For example, consider the testimony of Jean-Pierre, a farmer from Walikale, whose story is emblematic of the numerous families whose lives have been upended by the M23/AFC terrorists’ scorched-earth tactics. He recounts how his village was overrun by fighters last year: “They came at night, shooting everywhere. We ran into the forest with nothing. When they returned days later, they found that everything had been taken: their crops, their animals, even their tools. They had nothing left.”

For Jean-Pierre, the loss of his farm represents more than material deprivation; it signifies the severing of his connection to the land – a source of identity, sustenance, and pride. Agriculture is the backbone of rural livelihoods in North Kivu, yet systematic attacks on farming communities have left thousands destitute. Without access to seeds, tools or fertile land, many farmers like Jean-Pierre face an uncertain future, dependent on humanitarian aid to survive. The situation highlights the intergenerational impact of displacement, which can lead to a cycle of poverty, vulnerability, and despair.

Beatrice: A Nurse’s Anguish

Likewise, Beatrice, a nurse from Goma, conveys her distress regarding the scarcity of medical supplies during the city’s occupation by M23 killers. “We had patients succumbing due to our inability to operate machinery or refrigerate medications,” she states. “It felt as though we were contending with dual challenges: one, the pervasive illness, and the other, the opposition seeking to undermine our efforts.”

Beatrice’s words encapsulate the compounded struggles faced by healthcare workers and ordinary citizens alike. Hospitals and clinics, already underfunded and understaffed, become overwhelmed when conflict erupts, and the deliberate targeting of infrastructure — cutting off electricity, water, and supply routes — exacerbates the suffering of vulnerable populations. For Beatrice, every patient lost to preventable causes is a reminder of the human cost of war. Her testimony highlights how the destruction of essential services amplifies the trauma experienced by civilians, leaving them to grapple with both physical injuries and psychological wounds.

Displacement and Dependency: A Web of Exploitation

For many survivors, the trauma extends far beyond the immediate horrors of violence, with displacement becoming a defining feature of life in North Kivu. This has resulted in millions being forced to flee their homes searching for safety, often leading to the establishment of overcrowded camps. These IDPs typically face malnutrition, disease, and limited opportunities for employment. Even those who manage to escape the immediate dangers of war typically find themselves trapped in a web of dependency and exploitation, with limited prospects of rebuilding their lives.

Young men may join terrorists groups in the hope of earning a salary, perpetuating the cycle of violence. Women and children, who are disproportionately affected by the conflict, face the additional challenges of stigma and trauma associated with sexual violence, which is used systematically to humiliate and subjugate communities. Survivors such as Marie (name changed for privacy), a young girl abducted from her village near Rutshuru, recount harrowing tales of captivity and abuse. After enduring weeks of repeated assaults, she escaped, but now struggles to reintegrate into society due to societal stigma and untreated psychological trauma.

The Erosion of Social Structures

The conflict has had a significant impact on social structures, with widespread destruction of key communal facilities such as schools, markets, and places of worship. These buildings have been looted, burned or repurposed for military use. The impact of the conflict has also led to the displacement of entire communities, with many villages being completely destroyed, and their inhabitants dispersed across the region. This erosion of social cohesion is a major challenge for the process of reconciliation and recovery.

Elderly community leaders, who have traditionally been responsible for mediating disputes and preserving cultural heritage, are often among the most vulnerable during conflicts. Their absence leaves younger generations without guidance, further fragmenting societies already strained by years of instability. As Ezéchiel Sebuliri, national president of the Hutu community, noted, “When you destroy a village, you don’t just destroy houses—you destroy history, culture, and the bonds that tie us together.”

Resilience Amidst Ruins

Despite the challenges, there are examples of resilience emerging from the situation. Grassroots organisations and local leaders have taken the initiative to fill the void left by the collapse of formal institutions. Initiatives such as communal farming projects, educational programmes, and trauma counselling services demonstrate the determination of North Kivu’s people to overcome adversity. Women-led cooperatives, for example, have played a critical role in the distribution of clean water and the provision of solar-powered lighting in areas where infrastructure has been destroyed.

These efforts underscore the significance of empowering individuals to take charge of their future prospects. By cultivating self-reliance and mutual support, communities can initiate the process of healing and reconstruction. However, the success of such initiatives necessitates sustained investment and international backing. Absent external support, the potential exists for these fragile gains to be reversed by a resurgence of violence or economic hardship.

Bearing Witness to Suffering

The testimonies of survivors such as Jean-Pierre, Beatrice and Marie remind us that every statistic has a human story behind it – a life irrevocably altered by conflict. Their voices demand accountability and action. To ignore their pleas would be to perpetuate the cycle of violence and exploitation that has plagued North Kivu for decades.

As we move on to the next section, we will be exploring concrete steps that the international community must take to address this crisis, from the imposition of sanctions on Rwandan leaders to the provision of support for transitional justice mechanisms for victims. The time for silence is over; the time for meaningful intervention is now. Will the world rise to the occasion, or will it continue to prioritise profit over principle? The answer lies in our collective resolve to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity.

A Crisis That Demands Accountability

The actions of the M23/AFC terrorists, orchestrated and supported by Rwanda, represent a grave violation of international law and human rights. Their scorched-earth tactics have had a significant impact on the people of North Kivu, causing untold suffering and disruption to lives and livelihoods, while also creating instability in an already fragile region. A key concern is the impunity with which the crisis is unfolding. Despite substantial evidence of Rwanda’s involvement, key nations and institutions have adopted a largely passive stance, enabling the ongoing loss of life and property.

As we move forward, it is imperative to hold perpetrators accountable and demand justice for the victims. The next section explores the role of the international community in addressing the crisis, and the complicity of silence and the urgent need for action. The time for rhetoric is over; the time for meaningful intervention is now.

The Silence of the Powerful: Complicity in the Face of Atrocity

In the face of the Rwandan-backed M23/AFC terrorist group in North Kivu, one of the most concerning aspects of the crisis is the lack of response from some of the world’s most influential nations and institutions. The United States, the European Union, and the African Union – entities that wield significant diplomatic, economic, and military influence – have largely refrained from taking decisive action to address Rwanda’s transgressions. This inaction undermines the principles of international law and human rights and emboldens Rwanda to pursue its destructive agenda with impunity. By failing to condemn the atrocities in North Kivu and sanction those responsible, these powers are complicit in perpetuating the suffering of millions. Their silence speaks volumes, revealing a troubling prioritisation of geopolitical interests over the lives and dignity of Congolese civilians.

The United States: Strategic Ambiguity and Diplomatic Evasiveness

The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and a self-proclaimed champion of democracy and human rights, has a particular responsibility to address crises like the one unfolding in North Kivu. However, Washington’s response has been marked by equivocation and reluctance to directly confront Rwanda. Instead, U.S. officials have adopted a cautious tone, urging “dialogue” and “peaceful resolution” while avoiding explicit condemnation of Kigali’s role in the conflict.

This approach reflects a broader pattern of strategic ambiguity, where the U.S. prioritises maintaining strong relations with Rwanda – a key ally in East Africa – over holding it accountable for its actions.

A Pattern of Strategic Ambiguity

The U.S. government’s approach to the crisis in North Kivu demonstrates a calculated ambivalence that undermines its credibility as a global leader. While U.S. officials have expressed concern over the humanitarian situation and called for peace, they have consistently refrained from explicitly naming Rwanda as a perpetrator of aggression. For instance, the State Department frequently emphasises the importance of “regional cooperation” and “inclusive dialogue,” while sidestepping the pressing need to hold Kigali accountable for its covert support of the M23/AFC terrorists. This rhetorical evasiveness allows Rwanda to continue its destructive agenda without fear of repercussions, emboldening further transgressions.

This pattern of strategic ambiguity is not unique to the DRC crisis; it reflects a broader tendency within U.S. foreign policy to prioritise geopolitical interests over moral imperatives. In the case of Rwanda, Washington’s hesitancy stems from its vested interest in maintaining strong ties with Kigali, which it views as a stabilising force in an otherwise volatile region. However, this approach comes at a moral cost, eroding trust in international institutions and enabling authoritarian genocidal regimes to act with impunity.

Rwanda as a “Success Story”: A Convenient Narrative

One of the reasons for the U.S.’s reluctance to confront Rwanda is the carefully constructed narrative around the regime of criminal Paul Kagame, who has been accused of criminal acts. Since the 1994 genocide, the U.S. has invested heavily in rebuilding Rwanda, providing billions of dollars in aid and supporting its development initiatives. This partnership has created a vested interest in portraying Rwanda as a success story – a model of post-conflict recovery and economic progress. Kagame’s regime has strategically leveraged this image to garner Western support, despite mounting evidence of its authoritarian tendencies and involvement in regional terrorism.

Rwanda’s significant contributions to international peacekeeping missions serve to reinforce this narrative. As one of the largest troop-contributing countries to UN operations, including deployments to Mozambique and South Sudan, Rwanda has earned goodwill among Western powers. For the U.S., which relies on such partnerships to advance its security objectives, criticizing criminal Paul Kagame’s regime poses a significant diplomatic risk. By prioritising strategic considerations, Washington has effectively shielded Rwanda from accountability, even as the country perpetuates genocide and instability in the DRC.

The Moral Cost of Ambivalence

However, this calculated ambivalence does have significant moral implications. By failing to acknowledge Rwanda’s culpability, the U.S. undermines its credibility as a defender of human rights and sends a dangerous message to other genocidal authoritarian regimes: that violations of sovereignty and mass atrocities can be excused if they align with strategic interests. This double standard erodes trust in international institutions and emboldens those who wish to act with impunity.

For the people of North Kivu, the consequences are devastating. The U.S.’s failure to condemn Rwanda’s aggression leaves them vulnerable to continued atrocities, including massacres, sexual violence, and the destruction of their livelihoods. It also reinforces a sense of abandonment and betrayal, as victims of the conflict see powerful nations turn a blind eye to their suffering. This erosion of trust has a detrimental effect on multilateral efforts to promote peace and justice, creating an environment that genocidal authoritarian regimes like Kagame’s are all too eager to exploit.

Undermining Global Norms: A Dangerous Precedent

The U.S.’s reluctance to confront Rwanda is a matter of concern for the international community, as it sets a dangerous precedent for how the global body will address similar crises in future. By prioritising strategic interests over the principles of sovereignty and accountability, Washington undermines the very norms it claims to uphold. This selective enforcement of international law weakens the credibility of institutions like the United Nations and diminishes their ability to respond effectively to future conflicts.

Furthermore, the U.S.’s reticence is a contributing factor to the embodiment of other genocidal authoritarian regimes pursuing aggressive policies under the guise of “stabilization” or “security”. From Ethiopia’s war in Tigray to Myanmar’s persecution of the Rohingya, there is a clear indication that powerful nations are willing to overlook atrocities when it suits their interests. This erosion of global norms perpetuates cycles of violence and undermines efforts to build inclusive, democratic societies.

A Call for Ethical Leadership: Aligning Actions with Values

In order to re-establish its position as a leading advocate of democracy and human rights, the U.S. must ensure that its actions are in alignment with its stated values. This process begins with acknowledging the facts: that the actions of Rwanda in North Kivu represent a serious violation of international law and a betrayal of the principles that the U.S. claims to defend. Concrete steps must include:

1. Explicit Condemnation: The U.S. should publicly name Rwanda as an aggressor in North Kivu, breaking the cycle of rhetorical evasiveness that has enabled Kigali’s destructive agenda.
2. Targeted Sanctions: Washington should consider imposing sanctions on Rwandan leaders and entities implicated in supporting the M23/AFC terrorists. Such measures should target individuals responsible for orchestrating the conflict, as well as companies benefiting from the illicit trade of Congolese resources.
3. Strengthening Oversight Mechanisms: The U.S. should collaborate with international partners to enhance supply chain oversight, ensuring that American companies do not unintentionally fund conflict through the purchase of “blood minerals.”
4. Supporting Transitional Justice: The U.S. should advocate for investigations into war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in North Kivu, ensuring that victims receive justice and reparations.
5. Leveraging Diplomatic Influence: As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, the U.S. has a unique platform from which to mobilise international pressure on Rwanda. By leveraging its diplomatic influence, Washington can push for a comprehensive resolution to the crisis that respects Congolese sovereignty and addresses the root causes of the conflict.

The Price of Silence

The U.S. has been criticised for its handling of the situation in North Kivu, with commentators noting a lack of moral leadership that could have far-reaching consequences. By prioritising strategic interests over the principles of sovereignty and accountability, Washington risks undermining its credibility as a global leader and potentially emboldening genocidal authoritarian regimes. This complicity carries significant costs, including the loss of life and dignity of millions of Congolese civilians, the erosion of global norms, and the loss of trust in multilateral institutions.

As we move on to the next section, we will examine the role of the African Union in dealing with the crisis in North Kivu, and the reasons why the Union has been unable to do so. The fact that the AU has been unable to take action in the face of regional instability raises questions about its ability to fulfil its mandate as the continent’s champion of peace and unity. We will consider whether African leaders will rise to the occasion, or whether they will continue to prioritise non-interference over justice.

The European Union: Economic Ties and Moral Blind Spots

The European Union (EU) is a global leader in diplomacy, human rights advocacy and economic partnerships, and therefore in a unique position to influence the resolution of crises like the one unfolding in North Kivu. However, its response to Rwanda’s covert aggression through the M23/AFC terrorist movement has been marked by hesitation and half-measures, leaving millions of Congolese civilians vulnerable to continued atrocities.

While EU officials have expressed concern over the humanitarian situation in North Kivu, their actions – or lack thereof – reveal a prioritisation of economic interests over moral imperatives. This section examines how Europe’s deep economic ties with Rwanda have blinded it to the ethical dimensions of the crisis, enabling Kigali’s destructive agenda while undermining the EU’s own credibility as a champion of justice and accountability.

A Muted Response: Treating Symptoms, Not Causes

The EU’s strategy in North Kivu has been marked by a concentration on humanitarian aid rather than addressing the underlying causes of the conflict. While the provision of food, medical supplies, and shelter to displaced populations is undoubtedly essential, such efforts alone do not address the systemic issues driving the violence. Sanctions, arms embargoes, and targeted measures against Rwandan leaders have not been included in the EU’s policy toolkit. Instead, the bloc has adopted a diplomatic approach, issuing statements of concern without taking concrete steps to hold perpetrators accountable.

This subdued reaction mirrors a wider hesitancy to take a confrontational stance towards Rwanda. For example, when reports emerged implicating Rwandan military officers in orchestrating M23 terrorism, EU officials declined to pursue investigations or impose punitive measures, instead emphasising “dialogue” and “regional cooperation” to address the pressing issue of accountability. While this approach may appear reasonable in theory, it effectively allows Rwanda to continue with impunity, perpetuating cycles of violence and suffering.

Economic Interests: The Driving Force Behind Inaction

The EU’s reluctance to impose sanctions or punitive measures is rooted in its substantial economic interests in Rwanda. The EU is Rwandan’s foremost trading partner, importing goods such as coffee, tea, and minerals. These commodities constitute a substantial portion of Rwanda’s export earnings, fostering a mutual dependency that complicates any attempt to impose sanctions or punitive measures. Furthermore, European companies benefit from Rwanda’s role as a transit hub for Congolese resources, including coltan, gold, and other “conflict minerals”. By laundering these illicitly extracted resources through its economy, Rwanda effectively turns European markets into unwitting accomplices in the plunder of North Kivu’s wealth.

The economic interests in question represent a significant disincentive for the EU to act decisively. The imposition of sanctions or the severing of trade relationships could result in the disruption of lucrative deals and the strain of diplomatic relations with Kigali. For policymakers who prioritise economic stability and corporate profits, the cost of confronting Rwanda may be deemed too high. Consequently, the EU has opted to maintain the current conditions, even if this means ignoring Rwanda’s transgressions.

Kagame’s Image: A Pragmatic Partner or an Authoritarian Ally?

Another factor contributing to the EU’s inaction is the perception of Criminal Paul Kagame as a pragmatic partner in the fight against regional instability. Since the 1994 genocide, Kagame has cultivated an image as a strong, reform-minded leader who has transformed Rwanda into a model of economic progress and stability in East Africa. His autocracy’s emphasis on infrastructure development, anti-corruption campaigns, and gender equality has earned praise from Western donors and investors alike.

However, this narrative does not address the more concerning aspects of Kagame’s leadership. Under his leadership, Rwanda has become an authoritarian state where dissent is severely restricted, political opponents are systematically silenced, and human rights abuses are widespread. Despite the well-documented nature of these violations, many European policymakers continue to view Kagame as a reliable ally in addressing security challenges in the Great Lakes region. This misplaced trust has led to a dangerous complacency, allowing Rwanda to pursue its predatory and genocidal agenda in North Kivu without fear of repercussions. Briefly: Criminal Paul Kagame is a puppet for Western imperialism.

Ethical Implications: Legitimising Exploitation and Repression

By prioritising economic considerations over moral imperatives, the EU risks legitimising a model of governance that thrives on exploitation and repression. Its failure to condemn Rwanda’s aggression sends a clear message: that economic benefits outweigh the principles of sovereignty, accountability, and human dignity. This double standard undermines the EU’s credibility as a defender of human rights and emboldens other authoritarian regimes to act with impunity.

Furthermore, the EU’s inaction undermines its capacity to influence global norms concerning sovereignty and accountability.As a proponent of democratic values and the rule of law, the EU is expected to set an example. Its failure to act decisively in North Kivu weakens its influence and erodes trust in multilateral institutions. This inaction may be interpreted by smaller nations, particularly in Africa, as a tacit endorsement of Rwanda’s actions, further destabilising the region and undermining efforts to build peaceful, inclusive societies.

A Call for Ethical Leadership: Prioritizing Principles Over Profit

The EU’s current stance on the crisis in North Kivu represents a significant moral failing that cannot be ignored. To re-establish its role as a global advocate for justice and accountability, the bloc must place principles over profit. This process must begin with acknowledging the truth: that Rwanda’s actions constitute a grave violation of international law and a betrayal of the very values the EU claims to uphold.. Concrete steps must include:

1. Imposing Targeted Sanctions: The EU should consider imposing sanctions on Rwandan leaders and entities implicated in supporting the M23/AFC terrorists. Such measures should target individuals responsible for orchestrating the conflict, as well as companies benefiting from the illicit trade of Congolese resources.
2. Strengthening Supply Chain Oversight: European companies must be held accountable for sourcing minerals associated with conflict and human rights abuses. The strengthening of regulations and enforcement mechanisms can help disrupt the flow of “blood minerals” into global markets.
3. Supporting Transitional Justice Mechanisms: The EU should advocate for investigations into war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in North Kivu, ensuring that victims receive justice and reparations.
4. Promoting Regional Dialogue: While dialogue is essential, it must be accompanied by a robust approach to pressure on Rwanda to withdraw its support for the M23/AFC terrorists. The EU should leverage its diplomatic and economic influence to broker a lasting peace agreement that respects Congolese sovereignty.

The Cost of Complicity

The EU’s reluctance to take action against Rwanda’s aggression in North Kivu is not merely a missed opportunity; it signifies a betrayal of the principles the bloc purports to uphold. By prioritising economic interests over moral imperatives, the EU risks legitimising a governance model that is predicated on exploitation and repression. This complicity carries significant consequences, including the loss of life and dignity of millions of Congolese civilians, the erosion of global norms around sovereignty and accountability, and the loss of trust in multilateral institutions.In the following section, the wider implications of Rwanda’s aggression will be examined, with a particular focus on the devastating impact of resource extraction and the urgent need for international solidarity.The time for action is now. The EU must decide whether it will rise to the occasion, or continue to prioritise profit over principle.

The African Union: Paralysis Amidst Proximity

A glaring omission in the discourse on the crisis has been the African Union’s (AU) apparent inability – or lack of willingness – to intervene effectively. Given its stated mission of promoting peace, security and unity across the continent, one might expect the AU to be at the vanguard of efforts to resolve the conflict in North Kivu. However, its response to date has been characterised by inaction and internal divisions, leaving the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to grapple with the crisis largely unassisted. This apparent paralysis has not only undermined the credibility of the AU but also jeopardised the stability of an entire region already on the brink of chaos.

Rwanda’s Influence: Shielding Aggression Through Diplomacy

One of the primary reasons for the African Union’s (AU) ineffectiveness lies in Rwanda’s significant influence within the organisation. Rwanda has successfully shielded itself from criticism despite mounting evidence of its role in destabilising North Kivu by leveraging its reputation as a stable and economically progressive nation. Criminal Paul Kagame, an infamous figure on the African stage, has cultivated strong relationships with key leaders and institutions, enabling Kigali to deflect accountability. For instance, during AU summits, deliberations concerning Rwanda’s transgressions are frequently marginalised or portrayed as ‘internal matters’ that do not warrant collective intervention.

This phenomenon is indicative of a more extensive issue within the African Union (AU): the disproportionate influence exercised by certain member states. While the AU was founded with the objective of promoting unity and solidarity among African nations, it frequently encounters difficulties in overriding the entrenched interests of influential members. In the case of Rwanda, its perceived economic achievements and phony contributions to regional initiatives have enabled it to evade scrutiny, despite its actions posing a threat to the sovereignty and stability of a fellow member state.

Structural Challenges: Limited Resources and External Dependence

Beyond the realm of political dynamics, the African Union (AU) grapples with substantial structural impediments that impede its capacity to execute effective interventions. Primarily among these impediments is its persistent dearth of financial resources. In contradistinction to organisations such as the European Union, which are able to draw upon substantial funding from member states, the AU places significant reliance on external donors to finance its operations. This reliance undermines the AU’s autonomy and curtails its capacity to respond decisively to crises, such as the ongoing situation in North Kivu.

The AU’s reliance on ad hoc coalitions and regional bodies has been identified as a factor which further complicates the organisation’s response. Whilst frameworks such as the Peace and Security Council (PSC) have been established with the aim of addressing conflicts, their effectiveness is often impeded by bureaucratic delays, insufficient coordination and competing priorities. For instance, efforts to deploy peacekeeping forces or mediate negotiations frequently encounter obstacles due to disagreements among member states or logistical constraints. Consequently, the AU’s responses to crises are typically reactive, with interventions being initiated only after the escalation of conflicts.

A Culture of Non-Interference: Prioritizing Sovereignty Over Justice

Another critical factor contributing to the AU’s paralysis is the pervasive reluctance among African leaders to publicly criticise one another. Rooted in a culture of non-interference and respect for sovereignty, this mindset prioritises maintaining diplomatic harmony over holding perpetrators accountable. This reluctance to criticise is evident even in situations where there is a blatant violation of principles of sovereignty, as evidenced by the case of Rwanda’s covert aggression in North Kivu. Many leaders are hesitant to speak out, fearing that doing so could set a precedent for interference in their affairs.

This reluctance is particularly problematic given the proximity of the crisis to other AU member states, with the destabilisation of North Kivu posing a direct threat to regional security and potentially resulting in the spread of conflict to neighbouring countries such as Uganda, Burundi, and Tanzania. The influx of refugees fleeing the massacres strains already fragile economies, while the proliferation of terrorist groups exacerbates cross-border crime and terrorism. The African Union’s failure to address the underlying causes of the conflict undermines its core mandate and jeopardises the stability of the entire Great Lakes region.

The Human Cost: Abandoning Vulnerable Populations

The African Union’s (AU) inaction has had severe ramifications for the inhabitants of North Kivu, who are the primary victims of Rwanda’s terrorism actions. The local populace continues to be subjected to massacres, sexual violence, and the disruption of their means of subsistence, with minimal prospects of respite or redress. The absence of a resolute response has rendered them susceptible to ongoing atrocities, thereby reinforcing a pervasive sense of abandonment and betrayal. For a significant proportion of the Congolese population, the AU’s inaction is perceived not only as a failure of leadership, but also as a betrayal of the very principles of solidarity and unity that the organisation purports to uphold.

Furthermore, the African Union’s (AU) inaction has been demonstrated to erode trust in multilateral institutions and weaken efforts to build inclusive, democratic societies across the continent. When African leaders fail to hold one another accountable, they undermine the rule of law and embolden genocidal authoritarian regimes to act with impunity. This erosion of norms perpetuates cycles of violence and diminishes the AU’s ability to advocate for similar principles elsewhere.

A Call for Leadership: Fulfilling the AU’s Mandate

In order to re-establish its position as a proponent of peace and unity, the African Union (AU) is required to surmount its current state of inactivity and to adopt a course of action that is both decisive and effective in addressing the crisis in North Kivu. The initial step in this process is to recognise the truth: that the terrorism of Rwanda represents a serious violation of international law and a betrayal of the principles of sovereignty and accountability. Concrete steps must include:

1. Public Condemnation: The African Union (AU) should issue a clear and unequivocal condemnation of Rwanda’s terrorism, thus breaking the cycle of silence that has enabled Kigali’s destructive agenda.
2. Deploying Peacekeeping Forces: The African Union (AU) is obliged to collaborate with regional bodies, such as the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR), in order to deploy peacekeeping forces with the capacity to protect civilians and restore order in North Kivu.
3. Facilitating Dialogue:Although dialogue is imperative, it must be coupled with mounting pressure on Rwanda to withdraw its support for the M23/AFC terrorists. The African Union (AU) should utilise its diplomatic clout to mediate a sustainable peace accord that upholds Congolese sovereignty.
4. Addressing Root Causes: It is imperative for the AU to address the underlying drivers of the conflict, including resource exploitation and ethnic tensions, to prevent future outbreaks of massacres.
5. Strengthening Institutional Capacity: In order to enhance its ability to respond to crises, the African Union (AU) should prioritise reforms aimed at reducing its reliance on external funding and improving coordination among member states.

The Imperative of Action

The African Union’s (AU) failure to address the ongoing aggression in North Kivu by Rwanda signifies a grave deviation from its fundamental mandate of promoting peace, security, and unity on the African continent. By prioritising non-interference over the pursuit of accountability, the AU undermines its credibility and provides genocidal authoritarian regimes with a free hand to operate with impunity. The consequences of this complicity are substantial, including the loss of life and dignity of millions of Congolese civilians, the erosion of global norms, and the diminution of trust in multilateral institutions.

As we proceed in the subsequent section, we will examine the calamitous consequences of resource extraction on North Kivu’s communities and ecosystems. The exploitation of the region’s mineral wealth not only fosters massacres but also perpetuates cycles of economic disadvantage and ecological deterioration. Addressing this crisis necessitates a concerted endeavour by the international community to disrupt the flow of “blood minerals” and hold perpetrators accountable. The question arises whether the world will demonstrate the requisite resolve to prioritize principles over profit.

The Consequences of Silence: Enabling Atrocities and Undermining Justice

The failure of the United States, the European Union and the African Union to speak out against Rwanda’s covert aggression in North Kivu has had far-reaching consequences for the Congolese people, extending far beyond the immediate suffering experienced by the population. This inaction has had several consequences. Firstly, it has led to the perpetuation of cycles of massacres and impunity. Secondly, it has undermined the principles of international law. Thirdly, it has eroded trust in global governance. Finally, it has sent a chilling message to victims of atrocities worldwide. The failure of these influential entities to hold the perpetrators of these crimes accountable has enabled Rwanda to continue its destructive agenda unimpeded, resulting in millions of civilians remaining vulnerable to ongoing atrocities.

Emboldening Aggression: A Cycle of Violence and Impunity

The ongoing genocidal project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo can be primarily attributed to the absence of a robust international response, particularly from the United States, the European Union, and the African Union. This inaction has enabled the Rwandan criminal regime’s killing machine, known as the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF), to continue its genocidal campaign in the eastern province of North Kivu with impunity. The RDF is confident that it will not face any consequences for its actions, as powerful allies such as the United States and the European Union provide it with a veil of immunity, shielding it from any form of accountability for its actions. This dynamic perpetuates a cycle of mass killings and societal instability, as terrorist groups such as the M23/AFC terrorist outfit – supported by Rwandan murderers – continue to target civilian populations, destroy infrastructure, and exploit natural resources.

The absence of meaningful consequences for Rwanda’s transgressions establishes a perilous precedent, whereby the international community, by permitting Kigali to operate with impunity, conveys that sovereignty and human rights can be disregarded when in genocide with strategic interests. This has the effect of emboldening not only Rwanda, but also other genocidal authoritarian regimes, to pursue aggressive policies under the guise of “security” or “stabilization”. This assertion is substantiated by the international community’s apparent reluctance to address egregious human rights violations, as evidenced by the cases of Ethiopia’s war in Tigray, Gaza, and Myanmar’s persecution of the Rohingya.

For the people of North Kivu, this absence of accountability has resulted in devastating consequences, including massacres, sexual violence, and the destruction of livelihoods, with little indication of relief or justice. The failure of decisive intervention has left the population in a state of profound despair, exacerbating feelings of abandonment and betrayal. As Ezéchiel Sebuliri, the national president of the Hutu community, eloquently observed, “We do not deny that there are problems in our country, but it is not up to a foreign country to come and protect a community that has asked for nothing.” His words underscore the profound frustration and disillusionment felt by those who perceive powerful nations to be ignoring their suffering.

Undermining the Rule of Law: Eroding Trust in Global Governance

The absence of commentary from these institutions has been demonstrated to have a detrimental effect on the rule of law and erodes confidence in international mechanisms designed to protect vulnerable populations. When powerful nations fail to uphold their commitments to human rights and sovereignty, smaller states lose faith in the fairness and effectiveness of global governance. This erosion of trust weakens multilateral institutions such as the United Nations, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and regional bodies like the African Union, diminishing their ability to respond effectively to future crises.

For instance, the failure to impose sanctions on Rwandan leaders or to initiate an investigation into war crimes committed in North Kivu conveys a clear message: that economic and strategic interests are to be given precedence over the principles of justice and accountability. This apparent double standard has the effect of undermining the credibility of the concerned institutions, whilst also creating space for genocidal authoritarian regimes to operate with greater freedom. It is possible that smaller nations may interpret this silence as tacit approval of Rwanda’s actions, with further destabilising effects on the region and with a consequent undermining of efforts to build peaceful, inclusive societies.

Furthermore, the selective enforcement of international law has been demonstrated to weaken norms surrounding sovereignty and territorial integrity. The international community’s failure to address Rwanda’s violations of Congolese sovereignty has resulted in the establishment of a dangerous precedent that has the potential to embolden other nations to pursue similar acts of aggression. This erosion of global norms perpetuates cycles of violence and diminishes the prospects for lasting peace and stability.

A Chilling Message: Betraying Victims Worldwide

Finally, the inaction of the international community sends a chilling message to victims of atrocities worldwide: that their suffering may go unnoticed or unpunished if it does not align with the strategic priorities of powerful nations. For the people of North Kivu, this realisation compounds their trauma, reinforcing feelings of abandonment and betrayal. It also fuels resentment towards the very institutions that claim to champion justice and equality.

This betrayal is particularly devastating given the scale of the crisis. A significant number of Congolese civilians have been displaced, their homes destroyed, and their livelihoods shattered. Women and children bear the brunt of sexual violence, while entire communities face starvation and disease due to the deliberate targeting of essential infrastructure. However, despite overwhelming evidence of Rwanda’s involvement, powerful nations have chosen to prioritize economic and strategic interests over the lives and dignity of Congolese civilians.

For survivors such as Jean-Pierre, a farmer from Walikale whose village was razed by M23 thugs, the silence of the international community is a bitter pill to swallow. In his testimony, he recalls the night the M23 terrorists arrived, shooting indiscriminately. He and the other villagers fled to the forest with nothing but the clothes they were wearing. When they returned days later, they found that everything had been taken from them: their crops, their animals, even their tools. They had lost everything. Such narratives underscore the profound rupture engendered by the state-sponsored terrorism, effectively severing individuals from their means of survival and their sense of place.

Beatrice, a nurse from Goma, also expresses her profound concern regarding the scarcity of medical supplies during the city’s occupation, stating, “We had patients succumbing due to our inability to operate machines or refrigerate medications.” She further elaborates on the immense challenges faced by healthcare workers, likening their efforts to fighting dual wars: one against the pervasive illness and the other against those who sought to thwart their progress. Her words encapsulate the compounded struggles faced by healthcare workers and ordinary citizens alike, struggling to cope with both the physical and psychological scars of war.

A Call for Accountability: Breaking the Cycle of Impunity

In order to bring an end to the cycle of violence and impunity, the international community must demonstrate the moral fortitude to prioritise principle over pragmatism. This process must commence with the acknowledgement of the truth: that the actions of the Rwandan criminal regime represent a grave violation of international law and a betrayal of the principles of sovereignty and accountability. Concrete steps must include:

1. Imposing Targeted Sanctions: It is incumbent upon the international community, and in particular those nations with the greatest influence, to impose sanctions on the Rwandan cabal and entities implicated in supporting the M23/AFC terrorists. Such measures should be directed towards those individuals responsible for orchestrating the genocide, as well as companies benefiting from the illicit trade of Congolese resources.
2. Strengthening Supply Chain Oversight: In order to address the issue of “blood minerals” entering global markets, there is a necessity for international organisations and corporations to collaborate. The implementation of enhanced regulations and enforcement mechanisms can assist in ensuring that consumers are not unintentionally contributing to the funding of genocide.
3. Supporting Transitional Justice Mechanisms: It is incumbent upon the international community to advocate for investigations into war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in North Kivu, ensuring that victims receive justice and reparations.
4. Promoting Regional Dialogue: Although dialogue is imperative, it must be coupled with mounting pressure on Rwanda to withdraw its support for the M23/AFC terrorists. Multilateral institutions should utilise their diplomatic influence to broker a lasting peace agreement that respects Congolese sovereignty.

The Cost of Complicity

The lack of a public response from the U.S., EU and AU to Rwanda’s aggression in North Kivu can be seen as a moral failure with far-reaching consequences, representing a prioritisation of economic and strategic interests over the principles of sovereignty and accountability. This approach undermines the credibility of these powerful institutions and provides an example of genocidal authoritarian regimes of how they may act with impunity. This complicity has been demonstrated to have grave consequences, including the loss of life and dignity of millions of Congolese civilians, the erosion of global norms, and the loss of trust in multilateral institutions.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into the broader ramifications of Rwanda’s belligerent actions, centring our attention on the calamitous repercussions of mineral extraction and the pressing necessity for global solidarity. The pillaging of North Kivu’s mineral wealth not only perpetuates armed conflict but also fosters cycles of economic disadvantage and ecological deterioration. Tackling this crisis necessitates a unified endeavour by the international community to disrupt the network of “blood minerals” and ensure that those responsible are held to account. The question that now arises is whether the international community will demonstrate the requisite resolve to address this crisis, or whether the pursuit of profit will continue to prevail over fundamental principles.

A Call for Moral Courage: Breaking the Silence

The absence of discourse pertaining to Rwanda’s aggression in North Kivu cannot be attributed merely to oversight; rather, it is a calculated decision stemming from political expediency and a reluctance to engage with the moral implications of the situation.In order to disrupt this cycle, the international community must demonstrate the fortitude to prioritise principles over pragmatism. This process commences with acknowledging the truth: that Rwanda’s actions represent a blatant contravention of international law and a significant infringement on human dignity. It is only by taking such actions that the international community can demonstrate its commitment to the principles of justice and human dignity, thereby fostering conditions conducive to the restoration of peace and trust in the region.

In the following section, concrete measures that the international community can – and must – take to address the crisis will be explored. These measures include the imposition of sanctions on Rwandese criminals and the provision of support for transitional justice mechanisms for victims. The time for silence is over; the time for action is now.

Unity in Diversity: North Kivu’s Stand Against Balkanization

In the face of relentless aggression from Rwanda and its proxy, the M23/AFC terrorists, the ethnic communities of North Kivu have demonstrated an extraordinary capacity for unity and resilience. Despite facing considerable external challenges, these diverse communities, comprising the Nande, Hutu, Hunde, Nyanga, Tembo, Kumu, Tutsi, Bakano, Bokobo, Bakusu, Baliri, Bambuti, and others, have coalesced under the banner of the North Kivu Intercommunity to thwart any attempt to Balkanize the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This joint response highlights a fundamental truth: in the context of the DRC, there is no such thing as a minority or majority community. All ethnic groups are equal stakeholders in the nation’s future, and their shared commitment to sovereignty and territorial integrity acts as a bulwark against divisive forces seeking to exploit differences for personal gain.

A Unified Voice: The North Kivu Intercommunity Declaration

The North Kivu Intercommunity, a coalition representing the collective will of the region’s ethnic groups, is at the heart of this unity. On 6 February, leaders from across the spectrum convened in Kinshasa to issue a powerful declaration. In this declaration, they condemned Rwandan aggression and reaffirmed their dedication to preserving the DRC’s unity. The statement, which was signed by prominent figures such as Ezéchiel Sebuliri (national president of the Hutu community); Pacifique Misingi (president of the Walikale communities); and Jérôme Paluku Kandu (president of the Intercommunautaire), is unequivocal in its rejection of Rwanda’s justification for intervention, asserting that no community within the DRC has requested foreign protection.

Pacifique Misingi has asserted that “In our country, all communities are minorities” and that “No community has invited a foreign country to protect it. Otherwise, all the 450 tribes would request foreign interventions for their protection”. This declaration is more than a rhetorical stance; it is a call to action. By conceptualising the crisis as a matter of national concern rather than an ethnic one, the North Kivu Intercommunity seeks to preempt any attempts by external actors to foment discord among Congolese communities. The coalition underscores that while challenges do exist, these must be addressed through internal dialogue and cooperation, reflecting a nuanced understanding of the perils associated with Balkanisation—a process that would result in the fragmentation of the DRC along ethnic lines, thereby creating a conducive environment for further exploitation and instability. As Ezéchiel Sebuliri warned, “I send a clear message to the sons of the country who are with Rwanda and the M23: avoid associating with the enemy to destabilize or seek to Balkanize our country.”

The Myth of Ethnic Division: Exposing Rwanda’s Motives

Rwanda’s narrative of protecting a specific Congolese community is not only false but also strategically deceptive. The notion that any single ethnic group requires external intervention is at odds with historical realities. For centuries, the ethnic groups of North Kivu have coexisted, resolving disputes through traditional mechanisms and fostering a culture of mutual respect. Even during periods of tension, these communities have consistently rejected foreign interference, recognising that such involvement invariably leads to greater harm than good.

The M23/AFC’s discourse on safeguarding Tutsi interests is particularly insidious in nature, as it seeks to exploit lingering mistrust stemming from regional conflicts. However, leaders such as Farry Gitori, representative of the Tutsi community, have unequivocally denounced this manipulation, stating: “We do not need Rwanda to speak on our behalf.” The assertion that the Tutsi community’s destiny is in their own hands, to be determined collectively with their fellow Congolese, underscores the resilience of North Kivu’s communities in rejecting external patronage and the geopolitical manoeuvring of Kigali criminals.

Furthermore, an analysis of Rwanda’s actions reveals that its motives are not as altruistic as claimed. The primary motivation behind Rwanda’s aggression is not protection but rather the systematic exploitation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s mineral wealth, particularly coltan, gold, and other precious resources found in abundance in North Kivu. These resources serve as the true objectives, driving Rwanda’s economy and enabling it to project power across the region. Rwanda seeks to legitimize its predatory intentions by framing its intervention as a humanitarian mission, seeking to obscure its true intentions through the guise of benevolence. The North Kivu Intercommunity has exposed this fallacy, emphasizing that the war waged by Rwanda has no moral or legal basis.

Thwarting Balkanization: A Collective Effort

In order to counter any efforts to divide the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the North Kivu Intercommunity has developed a comprehensive strategy focused on three key pillars: unity, advocacy, and resilience. These interconnected initiatives reflect the coalition’s unwavering commitment to safeguarding the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and cultural diversity of the DRC. The North Kivu Intercommunity’s strategy is multifaceted, addressing both the immediate challenges posed by external aggression and the long-term structural issues that fuel division. By doing so, they provide a model for other communities facing similar challenges, showing how resistance to fragmentation and the construction of lasting peace can be achieved.

Unity: A United Front Against Division

The principle of unity lies at the core of the coalition’s efforts. By presenting a unified front, the coalition communicates a clear message to both domestic and international audiences: the people of North Kivu will not tolerate division. This unity is reinforced through regular consultations and joint initiatives, ensuring that all voices are heard and respected. Whether addressing grievances or celebrating cultural milestones, the coalition fosters a sense of belonging that transcends ethnic boundaries.

The remarkable unity displayed by the North Kivu Intercommunity is particularly noteworthy when considering the diversity of its membership, which encompasses over a dozen ethnic groups, including the Nande, Hutu, Hunde, Nyanga, Tembo, Kumu, Tutsi, Bakano, Bokobo, Bakusu, Baliri, and Bambuti. Each of these groups possesses its own unique history, traditions, and aspirations. However, rather than leading to division, these differences have contributed to a unifying strength. This unity is exemplified by prominent leaders such as Ezéchiel Sebuliri, national president of the Hutu community, and Pacifique Misingi, president of the Walikale communities. They emphasise that no single group possesses a monopoly on suffering or solutions, stating, “We do not deny that there are problems in our country,” and “it is not up to a foreign country to come and protect a community that has asked for nothing.”

The emphasis on unity provides a compelling counter-narrative to Rwanda’s attempts to exploit ethnic divisions. By framing the crisis as a national issue rather than an ethnic one, the coalition undermines the legitimacy of Rwanda’s intervention and reinforces the idea that all Congolese, irrespective of ethnicity, are equal stakeholders in the nation’s future. As Professor Michel Akilimali, president of the Hunde community, eloquently summarised, “Our strength lies in our diversity. We are stronger together than we could ever be apart.”

Advocacy: Amplifying Voices and Countering Misinformation

Advocacy is of crucial importance in countering misinformation and amplifying the voices of those affected by the conflict. The North Kivu Intercommunity has engaged with international media outlets, human rights organisations, and diplomatic missions to raise awareness about the true nature of Rwandese aggression. Their efforts aim to dispel narratives that portray the crisis as an ethnic conflict, instead highlighting its roots in resource exploitation and geopolitical manoeuvring. By challenging the complicity of silence that has enabled Rwanda to act with impunity, the North Kivu Intercommunity’s advocacy efforts contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of the conflict.

A seminal achievement of the coalition has been the exposure of the fallacy of Rwanda’s humanitarian justification for intervention. Leaders such as Farry Gitori, representative of the Tutsi community, have unequivocally rejected the notion that any Congolese group requires foreign protection, declaring: “We do not need Rwanda to speak on our behalf. Our destiny lies in our hands, and we will determine it together with our fellow Congolese.” This stance of autonomy and self-determination is indicative of the resilience demonstrated by North Kivu communities, who are unwilling to be instrumentalised in geopolitical machinations orchestrated by Kigali.

The coalition has also called upon the international community to impose targeted sanctions on Rwandese Cabal and entities implicated in providing support to the M23/AFC terrorists. They advocate for greater transparency in global supply chains with a view to disrupting the flow of “blood minerals” into international markets. By leveraging their collective voice, the North Kivu Intercommunity seeks to hold perpetrators accountable and ensure that justice prevails.

Resilience: Rising Above Adversity

The coalition’s approach to overcoming adversity is defined by its concept of resilience. Despite the devastation wrought by the M23/AFC terrorists, the people of North Kivu continue to rebuild their lives and communities. Initiatives such as communal farming projects, educational programmes, and trauma counselling services demonstrate their determination to rise above the ashes of war. These efforts are supported by grassroots organisations and local leaders who understand that recovery begins at the community level.

Communal farming initiatives, for instance, furnish displaced households with access to agricultural land and resources, thereby facilitating their restoration of self-sufficiency. Educational programmes concentrate on the reconstruction of educational facilities and the training of educators, thus ensuring that children do not encounter impediments to their learning. Trauma counselling services address the psychological sequelae of violence, thereby facilitating the healing and reintegration of survivors into society. These initiatives serve not only to empower individuals, but also to fortify the social fabric that binds North Kivu.

The coalition’s resilience is also evident in its ability to adapt to evolving challenges. For instance, when terrorists groups target water and electricity supplies in cities like Goma, local communities have organised themselves to find alternative solutions. Women-led cooperatives have emerged as key players in the distribution of clean water and the provision of solar-powered lighting, thereby showcasing the ingenuity and determination of North Kivu’s people.

Lessons from History: Preventing Fragmentation

History provides a number of cautionary lessons regarding the consequences of Balkanisation. From the former Yugoslavia to Sudan, endeavours to create nations along ethnic lines have resulted in protracted conflicts, widespread suffering and enduring instability. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), with its 450 ethnic groups and immense cultural diversity, is particularly vulnerable to such fragmentation. Should Rwanda succeed in its ambitions, the ripple effects would be felt across the continent, resulting in the destabilisation of neighbouring states and creating fertile ground for extremism.

The North Kivu Intercommunity is cognizant of the impending threat and is dedicated to averting a recurrence of history. Their unwavering stance against the fragmentation of the nation is not merely a reactive response, but rather an articulation of their vision for a unified and prosperous DRC. By nurturing unity, championing justice, and exemplifying resilience, the coalition provides a model for how heterogeneous communities can surmount challenges and forge a collective future.

A Model for Peace and Cohesion

The endeavours of the North Kivu Intercommunity serve as a testament to the efficacy of unity, advocacy, and resilience in the face of existential threats. By repudiating division and embracing their common identity as Congolese, these communities have successfully forestalled attempts to Balkanise their homeland. Their actions underscore the notion that diversity can serve as a source of strength rather than division, provided that inclusive governance and mutual respect prevail.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into the concrete measures that the international community is obliged to adapt to provide support to the North Kivu Intercommunity’s endeavours. These measures encompass the imposition of sanctions on Rwandan leaders and the addressing of the underlying causes of resource exploitation. The road to peace necessitates a concerted global response. The question therefore arises as to whether the world will heed this call, or whether it will continue to prioritise profit over principle. The answer to this question is predicated on our collective resolve to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity.

Lessons from History: The Perils of Division

History has demonstrated that the process of Balkanization can lead to severe consequences, as evidenced by the cases of Yugoslavia and Sudan. The attempts to create nations along ethnic lines in these regions have resulted in protracted conflicts, widespread suffering, and enduring instability. These historical examples serve as a cautionary reminder of the potential dangers posed by fragmentation, particularly in regions with the same ethnic and geopolitical complexity as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is a particularly pertinent case study in this regard, given its 450 ethnic groups and extensive cultural diversity, which render it especially vulnerable to internal fragmentation. Should Rwanda succeed in its ambitions to destabilise and Balkanise North Kivu, the ripple effects would be felt across the continent, resulting in the destabilisation of neighbouring states and the creation of a fertile breeding ground for extremism.

A Cautionary Tale: Yugoslavia and Sudan

The dissolution of Yugoslavia in the 1990s is widely regarded as one of the most significant instances of Balkanisation. Once a unified multi-ethnic state, Yugoslavia descended into chaos as nationalist leaders exploited ethnic divisions to consolidate power, resulting in a series of brutal wars, including the Bosnian War and the Kosovo conflict, which left hundreds of thousands dead and millions displaced. The period is characterised by significant instances of ethnic cleansing, mass atrocities, and the destruction of communities, which have left enduring scars. The case of Yugoslavia offers a poignant lesson, underscoring the profound consequences of ethnic divisions being exploited for political gain by external actors or internal elites.

The secession of South Sudan from Sudan in 2011 serves to highlight the perils associated with the division of nations along ethnic or regional lines. Although the separation was initially regarded as a solution to decades of conflict, it rapidly gave rise to new challenges. Internal divisions within South Sudan erupted into civil war, fuelled by competition over resources and power among rival ethnic groups. The ongoing conflict has resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives, the displacement of millions, and the entrenchment of the nation impoverished and instability. This example underscores the assertion that the process of Balkanization frequently serves to exacerbate, rather than resolve, underlying tensions, thereby engendering new cycles of violence and suffering.

For the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), these historical precedents must be regarded as urgent warnings rather than abstract lessons. The country’s rich tapestry of cultures and languages is both a source of strength and a potential vulnerability. If Rwanda’s efforts to exploit ethnic divisions succeed, the DRC risks following a similar trajectory of fragmentation leading to prolonged conflict, economic collapse, and humanitarian catastrophe.

The DRC’s Unique Vulnerabilities

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is a country of significant size and with a porous border, as well as abundant natural resources, which have led to concerns regarding external interference and the potential for internal fragmentation. The country is home to 450 ethnic groups spread across an area of 2.3 million square kilometres, which has led to concerns regarding the possibility of division. Rwanda has been accused of supporting terrorists groups such as the M23/AFC, allegedly with the aim of protecting specific communities. However, it should be noted that this is similar to the tactics used in other regions to justify intervention and the creation of spheres of influence. However, the North Kivu Intercommunity has repeatedly emphasised that no single group in the DRC has requested external protection, underscoring the absence of a unifying call for intervention. Pacifique Misingi, president of the Walikale communities, articulated this sentiment, stating, “In our country, all communities are minorities. No community has invited a foreign country to protect it.”

The rejection of external patronage is indicative of an acute awareness of the perils associated with Balkanisation, a process which could potentially lead to the fragmentation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) along ethnic lines. Such a scenario would not only compromise the nation’s territorial integrity but also generate power vacuums that could be utilised by armed groups, extremist organisations, and predatory states. Neighbouring countries such as Uganda, Burundi, and Tanzania would be susceptible to spillover effects, including refugee crises, cross-border crime, and regional instability. The Great Lakes region, already fragile, could descend into a quagmire of competing interests and unresolved grievances.

A Vision for Unity: Strength in Diversity

The North Kivu Intercommunity has acknowledged the potential for history to repeat itself and has therefore committed to preventing such an outcome. Its opposition to the process of Balkanisation is not merely a defensive measure, but rather an affirmation of its vision for a united, prosperous DRC. By fostering unity among the region’s diverse ethnic groups, the coalition seeks to demonstrate that diversity can be a source of strength rather than division.

As Professor Michel Akilimali, president of the Hunde community, eloquently expressed, “Our strength lies in our diversity. We are stronger together than we could ever be apart.” This sentiment resonates profoundly across North Kivu, where the emphasis remains on resolving issues through dialogue and cooperation rather than external intervention. By standing together, these communities are not only resisting aggression but also reaffirming their commitment to peaceful coexistence.

The coalition’s approach is indicative of a broader truth: that unity is not the absence of differences, but rather the ability to transcend them in pursuit of shared goals. Whether addressing grievances, celebrating cultural milestones, or rebuilding communities devastated by war, the North Kivu Intercommunity serves as a paradigm of how inclusivity and mutual respect can foster resilience and cohesion.

Preventing Fragmentation: A Collective Responsibility

In order to prevent the process of Balkanisation, it is not sufficient to rely solely on rhetoric; rather, it is imperative that action is taken at both the local and international levels. At the domestic level, the Congolese government must prioritise inclusive governance, equitable resource distribution, and reconciliation efforts to address the root causes of conflict. The strengthening of institutions, the promotion of transparency, and the ensuring of accountability are all essential to the building of trust among communities and the prevention of external actors from exploiting divisions.

The global community bears a responsibility to provide support for these efforts while ensuring that those responsible are held to account. The imposition of targeted sanctions on Rwandan leaders and entities involved in resource plunder, the strengthening of oversight of global supply chains, and the provision of support for transitional justice mechanisms for victims are all critical steps towards disrupting the cycle of violence and exploitation. As Ezéchiel Sebuliri warned, “I send a clear message to the sons of the country who are with Rwanda and the M23: avoid associating with the enemy to destabilize or seek to Balkanize our country.”

A Call to Action

The annals of history provide a clear and compelling evidence base: the process of Balkanisation has historically resulted in widespread suffering, instability and enduring conflict. In the case of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the potential consequences are of particular significance. The North Kivu Intercommunity’s unwavering commitment to unity provides a compelling counter-narrative to the divisive agenda of Rwanda, demonstrating that diversity can be a source of strength rather than division. However, it is important to note that the success of this endeavour is not guaranteed. In order to prevent further fragmentation, a coordinated response is required from the Congolese government, regional partners, and the international community.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into the concrete measures that the international community must undertake in order to address the crisis in North Kivu. These measures will include the imposition of sanctions on Rwandese cabal and the support of initiatives that promote peace and reconciliation. The time for silence has come to an end; the time for meaningful intervention is now. The question we must ask is whether the world will rise to the occasion, or whether history will repeat itself. The answer to this question is predicated on our collective determination to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity.

A Beacon of Hope

The unity exhibited by the ethnic groups of North Kivu serves as a beacon of hope in an otherwise dismal context. Their unwavering commitment to preserving the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC’s) sovereignty and territorial integrity acts as a robust refutation of those who seek to divide and conquer. By repudiating the fallacious dichotomy of majority and minority communities and embracing their shared identity as Congolese, they present a paradigm for how diversity can be a source of strength rather than division.

As we move forward into the subsequent section, we will delve into a comprehensive examination of the extensive ramifications of Rwanda’s belligerent actions, centring our attention on the systematic exploitation of natural resources and its repercussions on the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s developmental trajectory. The endeavour to counteract the process of Balkanisation is inextricably intertwined with the struggle to combat the exploitation of natural resources, as both phenomena emanate from a common underlying cause: the avarice and the lust for power of external actors. Concomitantly, these dual struggles delineate the ongoing pursuit of justice and peace in North Kivu.

The Hidden Agenda: Plundering North Kivu’s Natural Wealth

A close examination of Rwanda’s self-styled humanitarian mission in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) reveals a stark and undeniable reality: the systematic plundering of North Kivu’s abundant natural resources. This exploitation, facilitated by the M23/AFC terrorists and their Rwandan backers, exposes the true motivation behind the aggression – a ruthless pursuit of profit at the expense of Congolese lives and livelihoods. The region’s mineral wealth, including coltan, gold, tin, tungsten, and cobalt, has long attracted those seeking to profit from conflict and instability. This has resulted in a portrait of resource-driven warfare, where the extraction of “blood minerals” funds violence, perpetuates instability, and enriches foreign elites while impoverishing local populations.

The Mineral Bonanza: North Kivu’s Strategic Importance

North Kivu’s strategic importance in the global supply chain for critical minerals, particularly those essential to modern technology and industry, is well-documented.Coltan, short for columbite-tantalite, is perhaps the most coveted resource in the region, due to its use in the production of capacitors for smartphones, laptops, and other electronic devices. The high prices commanded by coltan on international markets are a result of its importance to the global economy. Similarly, gold remains a highly sought-after commodity, valued not only for its use in jewellery but also for its use in electronics and financial reserves. Tin and tungsten, integral to soldering and manufacturing processes, further enhance the region’s appeal to extractive industries. More recently, cobalt—crucial for lithium-ion batteries powering electric vehicles—has added another layer of complexity to the resource equation.

The distribution of minerals within the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is not uniform; rather, they are concentrated in specific areas, with North Kivu being one of the richest deposits. Consequently, control over mining zones becomes a strategic imperative for those seeking to dominate the region. For Rwanda, whose mineral reserves are comparatively modest, gaining access to North Kivu’s resources represents an opportunity to bolster its economy and solidify its influence in the Great Lakes region. By providing support to the M23/AFC terrorists, Kigali effectively secures a foothold in these lucrative territories, enabling it to channel illicit profits back into its coffers.

Illicit Trade Networks: From Mines to Markets

The exploitation inherent in this system of plunder is both sophisticated and pervasive. Key mining sites are often controlled by terrorists groups such as the M23/AFC, who employ coercion and violence to maintain their control. Miners, many of whom are impoverished locals seeking to earn income, are forced to work in hazardous conditions with minimal compensation. The minerals extracted are then smuggled across porous borders into Rwanda, where they are laundered and sold as “Rwandan” exports. This process involves a network of intermediaries, including corrupt officials, traders, and multinational corporations eager to secure inexpensive raw materials regardless of their origins.

As demonstrated by numerous documented cases of illicit trade, as reported by international watchdog organisations, there is compelling evidence to suggest that global supply chains are complicit in the perpetuation of conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). For instance, a 2022 report by the United Nations Group of Experts on the DRC revealed that Rwandan companies were exporting coltan quantities far exceeding their domestic production capabilities. Similarly, investigations by advocacy groups like Global Witness have traced shipments of Congolese gold to refineries in Europe and Asia, exposing the complicity of global supply chains in sustaining the conflict. These findings emphasise the role of demand for inexpensive minerals in perpetuating a cycle of violence and exploitation, with consumers unwittingly contributing to the suffering of the people of North Kivu.

Economic Devastation: The Local Toll of Resource Extraction

While Rwanda and its allies benefit from the mineral wealth of North Kivu, the local population is the primary recipient of the consequences of its extraction. Communities residing in proximity to mining facilities encounter significant environmental degradation, characterised by the clearance of forests, pollution of rivers and disruption of ecosystems. Artisanal miners, lacking proper equipment and safety measures, face daily risks of injury or death. Furthermore, the influx of armed groups competing for control over mining zones has the effect of exacerbating insecurity, resulting in the displacement of families and the destruction of livelihoods.

The economic impact of illegal mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) extends far beyond the immediate vicinity of the mines themselves. The diversion of resources to illicit channels results in the loss of revenue that the DRC desperately needs. According to estimates by the World Bank, the annual cost to the Congolese government in lost taxes and royalties due to illegal mining is estimated to be in the billions of dollars. This significant financial loss has a detrimental effect on public services, with schools, hospitals, and infrastructure chronically underfunded. In North Kivu, where basic amenities are already scarce, the consequences are particularly dire, with families struggling to access clean water, healthcare, and education, thus perpetuating cycles of poverty and marginalisation.

The Human Cost: Lives Sacrificed for Profit

The extraction of minerals such as coltan and gold is accompanied by a human cost, with individuals subjected to profound hardship and personal sacrifice. The M23/AFC’s control over mining zones is perpetuated through the use of terror, resulting in civilians facing massacres, sexual violence, and forced labour. The construction of mining operations often involves the razing of entire villages, displacing large numbers of people and leaving them reliant on humanitarian aid. Women and children, constituting the demographic most adversely affected by the conflict, face the additional psychological burden of stigma and trauma associated with sexual violence, a weapon employed systematically to humiliate and subjugate communities.

Those who manage to escape the immediate horrors of war often find themselves trapped in a web of dependency and exploitation. Displaced people frequently find themselves in overcrowded camps, where they face malnutrition, disease, and limited opportunities for employment. Young men, lured by promises of income, may join armed groups out of desperation, perpetuating the cycle of violence. Furthermore, the prospect of return for many is hindered by the occupation of their homeland or its uninhabitability due to environmental degradation.

Breaking the Cycle: Toward Accountability and Transparency

In order to address the issue of the plunder of North Kivu’s resources, a multifaceted approach is required that combines accountability, transparency, and sustainable development. First and foremost, greater scrutiny of global supply chains is necessary to ensure that companies sourcing minerals from conflict-affected areas adhere to ethical standards. Initiatives such as the Kimberley Process, which regulates the diamond trade, provide a template for extending oversight to other minerals. Furthermore, governments, particularly those of consumer nations, are obliged to enforce more rigorous regulations and impose penalties on entities found complicit in the financing of conflict.

At the regional level, there is a necessity for strengthened border controls and combated smuggling. Collaboration between the DRC, Rwanda, and neighbouring countries can facilitate the dismantling of illicit trade networks and the recovery of stolen assets. Additionally, investment in formalised mining sectors, where revenues are transparently managed and reinvested in local communities, offers a potential path toward economic empowerment. Programmes that provide alternative livelihoods, such as agriculture and small-scale entrepreneurship, can reduce reliance on mining and mitigate its negative impacts.

It is imperative that those responsible for violations are held to account. The implementation of targeted sanctions against Rwandan leaders and their allies complicit in the looting of resources, with investigations by international justice mechanisms, has the potential to serve as a deterrent to future abuses. It is incumbent upon the International Criminal Court (ICC) and regional courts to accord priority to cases involving crimes associated with illicit resource extraction, thereby ensuring that those culpable for such actions are held to account.

Conclusion: Reclaiming North Kivu’s Future

The issue of the plundering of North Kivu’s natural resources is not merely an economic issue; it is a moral one, representing a betrayal of the Congolese people’s right to benefit from their land and a violation of the principles of sovereignty and self-determination. As long as external actors continue to exploit the region’s wealth for personal gain, peace, and stability will remain elusive. The systematic extraction of “blood minerals” by Rwanda and its proxies has been a key factor in the ongoing violence and instability, and has further impoverished local populations, leaving millions of Congolese civilians trapped in cycles of suffering. This exploitation underscores a grim reality: the fight against resource plunder is intrinsically linked to the broader struggle for justice, unity, and dignity in North Kivu.

A Broader Struggle for Justice and Unity

It is imperative to address the root causes of the conflict, namely resource exploitation, ethnic division and external interference, in order to create a more promising future. The North Kivu Intercommunity’s resilience and unity serve as a compelling counter-narrative to Rwanda’s divisive agenda, demonstrating that communities can overcome ethnic division and reaffirm their shared commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the DRC. This serves as a poignant reminder that diversity can be a catalyst for strength rather than division, provided that inclusive governance, mutual respect, and equitable resource distribution prevail.

Nevertheless, the responsibility for resolving this crisis cannot be shouldered exclusively by the Congolese populace. The international community is under an ethical duty to provide assistance to their endeavours whilst ensuring that those responsible are held to account. Merely voicing support is insufficient; substantive measures are required. Will the global community demonstrate the requisite resolve to support the people of North Kivu and to uphold the principles of justice, equity and human dignity, or will it continue to prioritise profit over principle?

Concrete Steps for Meaningful Intervention

In order to address this crisis in an effective manner, the international community must take a series of decisive steps:

1. Impose Targeted Sanctions: It is incumbent upon the international community, particularly those nations and institutions with considerable influence, to impose sanctions on the Rwandese cabal and entities implicated in providing support to the M23/AFC terrorists. Such measures should be directed towards those individuals who have been identified as being responsible for orchestrating the conflict, in addition to companies that stand to benefit from the illicit trade of Congolese resources.
2. Strengthen Supply Chain Oversight: It is incumbent upon governments and corporations to collaborate to disrupt the flow of “blood minerals” into global markets. The strengthening of regulations and enforcement mechanisms can help ensure that consumers are not inadvertently funding conflict.
3. Support Transitional Justice Mechanisms: It is incumbent upon the international community to advocate for investigations into war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in North Kivu, ensuring that victims receive justice and reparations. Mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and regional courts must prioritise cases involving illegal resource extraction and atrocities committed during the conflict.
4. Promote Regional Dialogue and Cooperation: Although dialogue is imperative, it must be coupled with mounting pressure on Rwanda to withdraw its support for the M23/AFC terrorists. Multilateral institutions should utilise their diplomatic influence to broker a lasting peace agreement that respects Congolese sovereignty.
5. Invest in Sustainable Development: In order to address the root causes of the conflict, it is necessary to invest in sustainable development initiatives that empower local communities. Programmes focused on education, healthcare, infrastructure, and alternative livelihoods have the potential to reduce reliance on mining and mitigate its negative impacts.
6. Amplify Local Voices: It is incumbent upon the international community to amplify the voices of grassroots organisations and local leaders who are working tirelessly to rebuild their communities. Only by supporting their efforts can one ensure that recovery begins at the community level, thus fostering resilience and cohesion.

A Call to Action: Will the World Rise to the Occasion?

The time for silence has passed; the time for meaningful intervention is now. The people of North Kivu have demonstrated remarkable resilience in the face of unimaginable adversity, yet they cannot overcome this crisis alone. The international community must act decisively to disrupt the cycle of violence and exploitation that has plagued the region for decades. This is not just a Congolese issue; it is a global one. The plunder of North Kivu’s resources has been identified as a key factor in the destabilisation of entire regions, the exacerbation of humanitarian crises, and the undermining of global norms of sovereignty and accountability.

In reflecting upon the lessons of history and the consequences of inaction, a pertinent question remains: will the world demonstrate the collective resolve to act in a manner that prevents history from repeating itself, or will it fail to do so? The answer to this question is found in the commitment to stand with the people of North Kivu and uphold the values of justice, equity, and human dignity. The path forward is clear, but it requires courage, commitment, and collaboration. By working together, we can shape the future of North Kivu and lay the foundations for sustainable peace and prosperity.

Final Thought-Provoking Question:

In a world that is increasingly driven by profit and geopolitical interests, the question arises as to how the voices of the most vulnerable can be heard and acted upon. The question also arises whether it is possible to balance economic imperatives with moral obligations, or whether one must always come at the expense of the other. The people of North Kivu are counting on us to find an answer – and the time to act is now.

Joram Jojo

• Author
• Recent Posts

Congo

Administrator at Virunga Mountains

Empowering Congo’s Future: Protecting Virunga, Celebrating Culture, and Inspiring Change

Latest posts by Congo (see all)

• Rwanda, M23, and the Fight for Sovereignty: Key Issues in the DRC Crisis - March 8, 2025
• The Impact of UK Sanctions on Rwanda: Economic Fallout and Regional Stability Risks - March 1, 2025
• Rwanda Under Scrutiny: AGOA Violations Tied to Sexual Violence, Child Soldiers, & Killings - February 26, 2025

RELATED PUBLICATIONS:

Rwanda’s Role in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Geopolitics, Conflict, and Western Complicity THE M23 TERRORIST ARE RUNNING EXTORTION RACKETS THE DR CONGO HAS NO TRIBE CALLED BANYARWANDA The Heads of State and Government of the IGAD THE FLN COMMANDER, LT GEN WILSON IRATEGEKA IS DEAD The Economies in Africa are so disjointed THE ALLIED DEMOCRATIC FORCES HAS INTENSIFIED CIVILIANS ATTACKS NYIRAGONGO VOLCANO ERUPTION CAUSED PANIC IN GOMA CITY THE FIGHTING WITH UGANDAN AND RWANDAN TERRORISTS CONTINUES HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN DRC BY M23 TERRORISTS The Importance of Defense and Security Collaboration: Insights from the DRC and Republic of Congo Joint Commission Postponement of the Scheduled Summit: A Setback for the Luanda Peace Process President Felix Tshisekedi to appoint Prime Minister DRC PEOPLE’S PARTY FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEMOCRACY (PPRD) THE ARMED FORCES OF DR CONGO CONFIRM A PLAN TO BALKANIZE THE COUNTRY UGANDA ADF REBELS LOSE THEIR HEADQUARTERS OF MADINA ATTACKS BY ALLIED DEMOCRATIC FORCES (ADF) HAVE SUBSIDED NYATURA REBELS RETURN TO THE BUSH AFTER THEIR SURRENDER Rwandans are fraudulently crossing to DRC during the Coronavirus Pandemic VITAL KAMERHE HAS BEEN SENT TO MAKALA CENTRAL PRISON US AMBASSADOR TO THE DRC, MIKE HAMMER DEMOSTRATES AMERICAN GENEROSITY PRESIDENT FÉLIX TSHISEKEDI NEW PROMOTIONS AND APPOINTMENTS THE RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS , DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC DÉSIRÉ-CASHMIR KOLONGELE EBERANDE REPLACES VITAL KAMERHE